Archive for the 'Essays and Criticism' Category

Adam Yauch / MCA (1964 – 2012)

adam-yauch-mustache

The nasal, wise-ass tones of Adam “Ad-Rock” Horovitz and Michael “Mike D” Diamond dominated the Beastie Boys’ high-chemistry Globetrotter flows, but the raspy growl of Adam “MCA” Yauch grounded everything, and added a half-ton of menace.  Ad-Rock and Mike D were a couple of hip-hop Joe Pescis, and MCA was their DeNiro.  No wonder that when the band picked up instruments, it was MCA who laid down those thick, groovy basslines.  (So many great ones to choose from, but my favorite’s gotta be the breakdown of “Sabotage:” Right after you think the song’s just napalmed itself into ash and rubble, MCA slides in and lays the foundation for one more round of punk-rap fury.)

When I was 6 years old, I bought my first cassette: Once I heard “Paul Revere,” I had to own Licensed To Ill. “Paul Revere” may be a violent tale of thuggery, but for at least 2/3 of its running time, it’s obviously goofy posturing.  Ad-Rock and Mike D, as slick and funny as they may be, sound more crazy and deluded than tough.  The track only sounds remotely dangerous when MCA grabs the mic (”My name is MCA, I got a license to kill/ I think you know what time it is, it’s time to get ill“).

The band’s early objectification of women never felt genuine to me- even at my more tender ages, “Girls” sounded way more like parody than philosophy.  Still, the Beasties were kind enough to atone for their youthful frat-boy antics, and managed to evolve into more enlightened musicians without sacrificing their edge or irreverence.  In 1994, when grotesque misogyny was really starting to plague mainstream hip-hop, MCA devoted a couple lines during the first track of the hotly-anticipated Ill Communication to call out the chauvinists:

I want to say a little something that’s long overdue
the disrespect to women has got to be through
to all the mothers and sisters and the wives and friends
I want to offer my love and respect to the end

Yet MCA remained just as much the jester as his bandmates, directing many of the band’s super-fun, silly-loving videos. Fittingly, his last directorial effort is arguably his cinematic masterpiece: 2011’s hilarious, star-studded short film “Fight For Your Right Revisited.”

Along with Run-D.M.C., the Beastie Boys were largely responsible for blasting rap music into American suburbs.  With Paul’s Boutique, the Beasties (with plenty of help from the Dust Brothers) drastically expanded hip-hop’s horizons.  For over 25 years, they’ve been one of the most respected and reliably amusing bands in pop music.  All three Beasties deserve props for what they’ve accomplished.  But Adam Yauch was the group’s heart and their rock-solid center.

The Shins’ Port of Morrow and Excellence Executed Well: A Personal Essay

I waited until two days after Port of Morrow was released to buy it. For those that know my level of Shins adoration, the wait was unusual. Maybe it was an affront to my fandom, but I wasn’t all that impressed with the Shins pre-album performances. SNL, Letterman, youtube clips, it was all a mass of garbled wonder and it left me bewildered. How can I hold any disdain for a band that put out three outstanding albums? Was it too much to ask that a too-long absence produce a fourth masterwork? Hold on, I’ll explain why it was and turned out not to be.

So often, bands spiral downward. I think Jawbreaker’s Dear You (the fourth studio album from my favorite band) is a standout example. Critically destroyed, childishly flamboyant, over-recorded, Dear You is a trainwreck at times, but that’s why I love it. I’m not entirely sure why it was panned so vehemently– perhaps the saturation of emotional rock music led folks astray on the purpose of the album. Perhaps their popularity amongst adoring fans made dismissal an obvious choice. Jawbreaker was the exact crossroads: too small to fail and too popular to quit. Dear You turned into a labor of love, but wasn’t worth the problems it caused. Often, a band’s shelf-life is shorter than the albums they continue to create. That’s all I could think about as the release date neared: The Shins’ popularity and relative obscurity were demonizing what should have been an exciting day.

I was too young to really know why Jawbreaker fell apart or why people didn’t like Dear You. I was old enough to hear people complain about Wincing the Night Away not being as good as the Shins’ previous efforts. It was as if the album were an affront to those that worshipped Chutes Too Narrow and an excuse to dismiss The Shins for those who didn’t love them anyway. I figured it was their last release. Once James Mercer started writing with Danger Mouse, his path diverged from mine and I was content with the three albums he gave the Shins’ moniker. Hell, I even loved Wincing, unlike most folks I knew. There was nothing missing. The Shins were infallible and they’d chosen to stay that way. Then, I saw pitchfork articles touting terribly recorded live material. Then iTunes released “Simple Song.” Then the release date. Then my trepidation and waiting.

Had The Shins ruined my attraction to them? After 7 years, the idea of a new Shins record was more appealing than actually knowing one was coming. I held off on listening to bad recordings, opting instead for the “Simple Song,” a Cars-esque theatrical love song. I waited for SNL’s sneak peek too, hoping for a decent sound, but I wasn’t impressed. The company I was in were not Shins fans– not even close– so maybe they had affected how I heard the performance.

See, that’s where I failed: I needed to cull my youthful exuberance. When Dear You came out, I was just excited to hear from Jawbreaker again. I wasn’t worried about their stranding in the music world or what I would think if the record wasn’t great. After all the hand-wringing, I read what my friend wrote on facebook (thanks, Scott H.) and I got excited again. To paraphrase: “I’m a sucker for the Shins.” Me too, I forgot. So why am I scared? Two days after the release of what should have been my most anticipated album in a decade, I came home from work, copped Port of Morrow, and got comfy. My fears washed away pretty quickly– by the time Mercer refrains, “You were always to be a dagger floating straight to their heart,” I was satiated. Port of Morrow is great and I’ve listened to it damn near exclusively since I bought it. Fears allayed, I focused on why I would be so fretful, fell into a rabbit-hole of Chutes proportions and have reminded everyone I know of how good this band was/is.

The difference in my youthful ignorance and my world-wearied exterior isn’t personified often: I’ve softened on so many issues and I’m no elitist. Port of Morrow is not an album with grandiose pertinence like their past work. In fact, it’s a bit more direct and preachy rather than story-telling or dynamic. “September” is a grand exception. “40 Mark Strasse,” “Simple Song,” “It’s Only Life,” and “Fall of ‘82″ are all direct messages and unlike anything Mercer has ever done. All the songs masterpieces, collectively, Port of Morrow straddles the line between cheesiness and exaltation. Either way, it’s pop-perfection. He croons over certain songs, whispers and crawls over others. Even the iTunes b-side “Pariah King” serves as an example of how good Mercer is. Filler keyboard rambles, strangely entrancing vocal-highs and philosophical understandings of life amongst the bottom-feeders underline the one thing I wasn’t expecting: I love this band despite their absences and faults. I love them despite my own.

I was planning on just writing “It’s excellent,” and leaving the review at that. And it would’ve done this album some justice. Port of Morrow deserves the boring backstory, though. The Shins deserve my collective sighs and overwrought personality. They deserve everything I’ve got, because they’ve been consistently astounding for this long. Wrapping my head around Mercer’s genre-bending boldness is never old, despite how long I wait. I’m ready to believe again, The Shins. You’ve earned more than what I offered this record, but it won’t happen again, I promise. With renewed vigor, I’m telling everyone the truth. Port of Morrow is more than a comeback record, it’s more than a return to greatness, it’s more than perfection.

It’s excellent.

Lost Records: Sonna’s We Sing Loud Sing Soft Tonight

When I bought two Sonna records in the fall of 2003, I had no reason to think I’d ever really fall in love with them. They were $4 apiece, used. I was working at WUAG in Greensboro, NC and had played Sonna a few times on my radio show. The musicianship seemed scattershot– music to write to and forget. In fact, I really only listened to them that fall. The records themselves sat on my shelves (reverse alphabetical order; next to Seam and Sebadoh) for a good four years before my rediscovery of We Sing Loud Sing Soft Tonight.

It was a true NYC winter in 2009. Those who know winter walking know how snowy weather compounds walking. They know how snow means more walking, harder walking. It means tricky slopes and steps, ice spots and huge hills of piled-up black snow along walkable parts of the sidewalk and street. It means constant vigilance. Once you get home, the bottoms of your jeans freezing cold and wet, it meant relaxing in the warmth. I went on a record exploration during those cozy nights. I was working on my first book and decided to break out the instrumental jams of a few years ago. When I ran across Sonna I furrowed my brow. They were exactly what I needed, but I couldn’t remember even buying the records.

Continue reading ‘Lost Records: Sonna’s We Sing Loud Sing Soft Tonight’

Whitney Houston (1963 – 2012)

“The Greatest Love Of All” was already a punchline by the time Sexual Chocolate got a hold of it in Coming To America, and maybe it was a punchline for several good reasons.  But certainly none of those reasons are anything Whitney Houston brought to the song.  She sold that junior high graduation hymn better than any mortal could ever expect to.  Bette Midler could belt the heck out of “From A Distance,” and Mariah Carey could make your mom cry with “Hero,” but neither ever convinced me they were really, truly feeling it.  Whitney made “The Greatest Love Of All” schmaltz we can believe in.

Maybe a bit of Desert Storm-fueled jingoism helped Whitney’s Super Bowl “Star Spangled Banner” hit #20 in 1991…but a decade later, in the weeks after the 9/11 attacks, when we needed not just patriotism but hope and comfort, we put her “Star Spangled Banner” back on the Billboard chart, and we put it there 14 spots higher than last time.  (Hell, in 2001, Whitney’s “Star Spangled Banner” charted in gosh-darned Canada.)  To date, her version is the only version of our national anthem ever to hit Billboard.  Hendrix’s Woodstock version never charted, and they played some out-there shit on the radio back in ‘69.

Now take a moment to consider just how many singers have sang “The Star Spangled Banner” in the 54 years we’ve had Billboard charts.

Yes, along the way Whitney lost her power. They could- and they did- take away her dignity.  But it’ll be much harder to take away her many, many Moments in Time, when she was more than anyone thought she could be.  And I absolutely realize how saccharine this all sounds as I write this, and yet when I hear Whitney sing it, I believe it, because I believe she believed it.

Of Bathgate and Buckner and I: Transitions from Personal to Impossible

During my break from 10L, I didn’t stop listening to music. I didn’t stop caring. I just stopped writing about it. I laid in bed and ate fried chicken (more like friend chicken, youknowhatImean?) and read stories from the NBA Lockout. I tried to care more about college basketball. I drank some and didn’t drink a lot at the same time. Hell, I’m not sure that I did much of anything else. Milk and vegetables spoiled a lot more than I wanted them to because I overshot my mornings by a mile and spent the days lamenting.

If anything actually offered me solace, it was the occasional jam with Chris Bathgate’s Salt Year and trying to figure out if I really liked Richard Buckner’s Our Blood. My relationship with music isn’t always as complicated as it is with Buckner, as Bathgate’s catalog can attest. I am drawn to every Richard Buckner album with delirious haste. Listening and re-listening, I’m hooked by the opening riff. Then, I lose something each time I finish the record. Is Our Blood to be appreciated in small doses? Is the listener really to dismiss the catalog each time he/she hears a new song? The challenge of ignoring an artist’s past is really on trial here*. There’s nothing really different about this record as compared to the last few releases, but is that such a bad thing?

Continue reading ‘Of Bathgate and Buckner and I: Transitions from Personal to Impossible’

Why My Opinion Doesn’t Matter: The Best Three Records I Heard in 2011

I’m not a genius by any means. I’m an average bro with a slanted opinion. I’m a half-wit, a writer’s writer, a stylist without a popular canvas. I know Girls and Watch the Throne and Wavves. I know Katy Perry and Lady Gaga. I know Kanye and Cudi. I know all the cool jamz people gravitate toward. I know them and I often like them. It’s just that, and I know I am not entirely alone, I tend to allay my hopes on the forgotten, misunderstood albums that receive little fanfare. For example, one of my favorite albums of all time, Jets To Brazil’s Orange Rhyming Dictionary is an audible eyesore– a series of strange canvases and literary intentionality. My love of later Superchunk albums (and early ones for that matter) isn’t necessarily wrong, it’s just doesn’t matter. Problem is, the unintentional consequence of seeking the destitute and unloved albums in American music drives away readers as quickly as it allows self-satisfaction.

So what was different about 2011? The music was, but that’s to be expected. My attitude toward life? Not really. I changed locales, came to grips with some personal issues, etc. I didn’t change tastes, though. There wasn’t even a subtle shift. I like the same records now as I did then, just more of them. That said, I really do believe that three records absolutely stood out for me in 2011 for their styles, their movements, their irrepressible charisma, their difference engines in creating artistic masterworks. These albums bent genres, created new walls and unburdened a strange year for music as a whole. Think about it, 2011s most popular rap album may well have been made by one of the best producers in the world and he didn’t make the beats. Skrillex is nominated for grammys. Tom Waits put out an at-best mediocre album. Bon Iver became Bonnie Raitt (not a knock, that album rips in spots). All the while, Storms, Grails and Cymbals Eat Guitars created intimidating, challenging, beautiful records to little response.

Continue reading ‘Why My Opinion Doesn’t Matter: The Best Three Records I Heard in 2011′

Disagree to Agree: Taylor Swift’s Speak Now, Pt. 4

taylor swift

In this new series, 10 Listens will publish two writers’ takes on a given record, artist, or concept. The exchange will be given as a series of brief essays, with each subsequent one a response to the previous. The inaugural series ends today with final words by Brad Nelson. Read part one, part two, and part three as well.

Maybe the problem is in the approach: As you would have it, B., Swift fails in her approach. She is one-dimensional (I need a shortlist of singer-songwriters that fly in more than one dimension; that peculiar and intense focus I have always called “craft”).  She speaks with unearned authority about things beyond her amassed experience (the album is called Speak Now and its whole conceit is stupid, raw, untempered shit better left unsaid). She is relentlessly smug and self-serving. If you draw back to realize the map of Taylor Swift, what you glimpse is some ugly overgrown center of self-involvement, rich webs that spiral upon themselves unto complete dissolution. It is emblematic of a generation with Facebooks. Blogs. Empathy in inadequate sums. No music can sustain this weight.

But I can’t think of Swift as a singer-songwriter. She would have me think that, what with her acoustic guitar and how on this record she drags her mouth around exclusively confessional syllables. But she writes pop music; moreover she initially emerged as a writer of Nashville pop. In this realm, artist and audience take a perverse joy out of limited dimensional migration. I do too; I don’t expect anything beyond this because genre doesn’t cater to outsized expectations. Continue reading ‘Disagree to Agree: Taylor Swift’s Speak Now, Pt. 4′

Disagree to Agree: Taylor Swift’s Speak Now, Pt. 3

Taylor-taylor-swift-784501_776_799

Taylor Swift is basically a goldendoodle.

In this new series, 10 Listens will publish two writers’ takes on a given record, artist, or concept. The exchange will be given as a series of brief essays, with each subsequent one a response to the previous. Today, B Michael responds to Brad Nelson’s response to his original post.

I do not disagree: Taylor Swift’s main songwriting strength is the ability to pick out one, two, or three details in a situation or story; she bludgeons you about the head, neck, and ears with her limited observational palette until you’ve mistaken detail for depth. Shining up a mirror really good doesn’t provide you with a singular biographer. At the most basic level, it’s still you and your experiences that are what allows you to parse and express your idea of you and your experiences. And I’m saying that Taylor Swift isn’t even a particularly well-polished mirror. She’s more like one of those pitted, surface-blasted plastic mirrors you’d find at a garage sale or broken into pieces in an alley.

Saying that something isn’t deep has already lodged within it the rejoinder that you’re not trying hard enough. It’s like, Oh, you don’t get the latest Almodóvar film? It’s like cutting the cheese in an Olympian’s hyperbaric chamber. Sorry…

Continue reading ‘Disagree to Agree: Taylor Swift’s Speak Now, Pt. 3′

Disagree to Agree: Taylor Swift’s Speak Now, Pt. 2

taylor swift again

In this new series, 10 Listens will publish two writers’ takes on a given record, artist, or concept. The exchange will be given as a series of brief essays, with each subsequent one a response to the previous. Today, Brad Nelson responds to yesterday’s post.

There is nothing I do better than revenge.

Taylor Swift is mean.

Taylor Swift is also nice, especially when nice things happen to her. Or when more obscure pleasures, perhaps unrealized, announce themselves—the exact chemistry of a night light or a green eye, or what tethers 2 a.m. to anxiety.

Continue reading ‘Disagree to Agree: Taylor Swift’s Speak Now, Pt. 2′

Disagree to Agree: Taylor Swift’s Speak Now, Pt. 1

What a b----

In this new series, 10 Listens will publish two writers’ takes on a given record, artist, or concept. The exchange will be given as a series of brief essays, with each subsequent one a response to the previous. Today, B Michael Payne leads off with his initial take on Taylor Swift’s Speak Now.

It’s the sort of thing we might not ever agree on, so I’ll lead with the fact that I don’t really care for how Taylor Swift’s Speak Now sounds. If I had to elaborate, or if you wanted me to “say more,” I would say that I somewhat dislike the music. But it’s more like I just don’t deign to notice it.

It’s much more interesting to me, what she says and what she says means. Continue reading ‘Disagree to Agree: Taylor Swift’s Speak Now, Pt. 1′