Monthly Archive for June, 2010

Classic and Unappreciated: Cambodian Rocks

cambodian_rocks

Is it possible to hear the sound of approaching doom?  Does approaching doom sound kind of like room tone, but darker?  Can we hear approaching doom squeezing a singer’s nerves tightly in its clutches?  Can we physically sense the presence of approaching doom as it plays maestro to an ill-fated orchestra?

For instance, some people seem convinced that they could hear Kurt Cobain’s demons lurking in the shadows of Unplugged In New York.  Yet how many of those claims come from keen human intuition, and how many are simply embellished memories revised by tragedy?  Hard to tell. Continue reading ‘Classic and Unappreciated: Cambodian Rocks’

Caw! Caw!: Bummer Palace

Caw! Caw! should be more well known. Unless you were searching specifically for this review, chances are you’ve never heard of Caw! Caw!. Yet, they’ve been playing music in and around their native Chicago since 2001 and have been independently releasing their music through a 2008 EP and a MySpace music page. From what I’ve discovered in the backwaters and far corners of the internet, the band’s been winning over fans one at a time the old fashioned way: with high-energy house shows, mini-tours, and artistic sincerity. 2010’s Bummer Palace is their wildly ambitious full-length debut, a sprawling statement proclaiming the obsolescence of genre descriptors and musical boundaries.

It’s difficult to write about how Caw! Caw! move from indie rock to post-rock to pop to punk, adding flourishes of soul or ska or new wave, all with a soaring falsetto reminiscent of Sigur Ros. It’s clear that Caw! Caw! draw from an ever-growing body of influences, and I’m sure that the unfamiliar reader is probably about ready to dismiss this band as one that suffers from the sheer sum of its parts.  However Caw! Caw!’s sound is remarkably cohesive and Bummer Palace is surprisingly devoid of jarring transitions. Continue reading ‘Caw! Caw!: Bummer Palace’

Wolf Parade: Expo 86

Seemingly, being in Wolf Parade is a simple process. Pick a riff, pick a strange name (Yulia, Anastasia, etc.), pick a catch phrase, repeat all ad naseum.  Predictability is all the rage.  While I like aspects of their newest effort, I find that most of the time I am tuned out, waiting for the next song, eager to be able to move to another album.  It was quite the same way I felt about the newest Black Keys record.  While rock bands struggle to find new ways to execute the same tired material, certain bands have just decided to embrace their inner-70s/80s and make good use of some old tricks.

I’m not totally against Wolf Parade on this.  I actually like the path they’ve chosen.  I understand their decisions on this album, for the most part.  Expo 86 feels like a mixtape of Wolf Parade’s favorite bands– a list of influences combined with their off-kilter lyrics.  Then, after all the dot-connecting dust settles, the listener is left with a quandary. Do we like what Wolf Parade likes? Are we that into their panicky vocals, their friskiness, their overly-simple keyboard warbles?  Depends on the person.  I’d like to explain why I am not happy with the album, but it’s difficult.  Difficult because I like what they like, I want to like what they do.  The manic energy, the overall aesthetic– Expo 86 is an album I am inclined to love.  Yet, for all it’s charm and sing-along rollicking, I don’t love it. Continue reading ‘Wolf Parade: Expo 86′

The Melvins: The Bride Screamed Murder

melvinz452

Let’s say you’re watching a horror movie where the villain is this Lovecraftian beast, as old as time itself.  Despite its gargantuan size and blob-like physique, this beast can move with the force of a rhino and the agility of a mongoose.  It has the insouciant attitude of a high school bully in his third senior year.  It could maul an asthmatic little girl, then turn right around and high-five his beastly bros while they all chuckle like dumb stoners.

And just as this beast is lurching toward one of its victims, ready to strike- suddenly you see the zipper on the costume start to unzip.  Then the dude inside the costume jumps out, looks right into the camera and plays 6 verses of “Oh Susanna” using armpit farts. Continue reading ‘The Melvins: The Bride Screamed Murder’

James Murphy, The Grandfather of New York Music?

James Murphy on the Floor

There are roughly three New Yorks. There is, first, the New York of the man or woman who was born there, who takes the city for granted and accepts its size, its turbulence as natural and inevitable. Second, there is the New York of the commuter — the city that is devoured by locusts each day and spat out each night. Third, there is New York of the person who was born somewhere else and came to New York in quest of something ….Commuters give the city its tidal restlessness, natives give it solidity and continuity, but the settlers give it passion. —E.B. White

LCD Soundsystem has embodied the idea of New York City better than any other band in the 00s. The Strokes updated the city’s previous ur-band, The Velvet Underground. But their method was less about appropriation and more about being endearing apes; in the process, they released the best New York City album of the decade. They also proved that the city has a short attention span.

In the way these things happen, LCD Soundsystem—synecdochically representing James Murphy—had a lot to do with The Strokes’ success. Back in the very early oughts, Murphy’s (and U.N.K.L.E. Goldsworthy’s) DFA Records injected a straight shot of cool back into the notion of antsy guitar music. Their efforts, composed of equal parts killer 12” singles and druggy dance parties, made energetic guitar rock palatable again. Not even Limp Bizkit could vanquish the ineluctable chic of six strings, young bodies, and ample free time. It sounds a little fulsome to say, but if it weren’t for Murphy’s part in it, rock music may have died a quiet death grieved for only by a bunch of 30-somethings concealing tribal tattoos under mourning garb and gaping holes in their ears where formerly there were spacers and other ridiculous objects.

Beside his gift for astute reinvention, Murphy is connected to New York in a few other ways. He was once offered a job to write for Seinfeld, the greatest TV show about New York. Like the former king of New York, Sinatra, he grew up in New Jersey (though not within spitting distance, like The Chairman). He knocked around in bands, DJed, lost his self-worth, and found some (semi-) ironic self-loathing. Murphy has sank in, swam through, and crested above the fray like any other successful New Yorker.

Now that we’re rounding on historical closure of the LCD Soundsystem, it might be interesting to try to figure out what the hell they—and Murphy—mean. At the beginning, let’s start at the beginning. Back in 2005 when the first LCD Soundsystem album came out, Pitchfork ran a The Wire-inspired Jukebox column in which Nick Sylvester created a great dialogue with the nascent indie superstar. It ends with Murphy saying, “I’m 35, an artist with a debut record. I feel like a grandfather.” Of course, Murphy didn’t spring out of the firmament fully-formed. He’d been in bands since he was 12, produced records, and started a label in 2001. But he had a point, which the Jukebox column drew out over and over again: Making pop music is a young person’s pastime, and within the strictures of the format, 35 might as well be 85 or 1 million and five.

Murphy’s music has a particularly implacableness about it, even though, considered discretely, it can be wholly placed. This guitar solo sounds like Eno; this synthesizer is lifted straight from Tom Tom Club; that vocal is all David Byrne. But there’s an even more salient touchstone that you’d hardly ever consider: Gravity’s Rainbow. In a recent profile by Chuck Klosterman, Murphy inveighs against pretension saying, “You know, the first time I read Gravity’s Rainbow, I did so because I thought it would make me seem cool. That was my original motivation. But now I’ve read it six times, and I find it hilarious and great and I understand it.” Like Pynchon (another notorious New Yorker), Murphy draws from  droves of source material and cultural accretion to create a decidedly unconventional, almost un-American art. Pynchon’s great novel would never be mistaken for the work of, say, a European writer. But its sprawling Euro-centricism can’t be lost on the reader. In a similar way, even though many of the references in Murphy’s work are American, it falls fairly well into the Factory Records mold of dance-punk. Except that it also doesn’t at all.

Consider Murphy, the face of hip New York City, retreating to Los Angeles to record the final LCD album. Consider Murphy’s stance on his lost opportunity to write for Seinfeld. A 2004 profile by The Guardian mentions that Murphy had the letter offering him the gig pinned on his wall. He called it “the biggest mistake of my life,” and goes on to call himself “a fucking lifetime failure.” Eight years later, in the Klosterman piece, he refers to the Seinfeld job by saying, “But even knowing what I know now, I’m happy I didn’t do it.” Consider the music itself: On the one hand, Murphy almost creates a pastiche of dance music, one that’s not so much filled with but rather just is a thousand points of musical reference; on the other hand, and he’s consistent and unequivocal about this, his only desire is to make music that makes you move your body.

Every successful person is a mass of contradictions, and the more successful the person, the deeper the contradiction. Fitzgerald’s crack-up is well-known. The Googlers “Do No Evil” mantra is undercut by their insidious, pervasive data collection. Murphy’s head-body distinction defines him and propels his music from being merely anything to absolutely this thing. What is this thing?

I made a mistake once, and then I made it a few more times, and then—I think—I never made it again. At least not from negligence. My first semester in college I’d get handed back in this one class papers all marked up. “Don’t use ‘this’ on its own. It refers to something.” The titular “This” that refers to no antecedent is the perfect image for Murphy’s project. It’s the most general pronoun, and Murphy’s music is the most general music because it appeals to everyone. (Or “everyone,” if you’d rather.) While it sounds like it’s built up from a mound of references, it also sounds like what it is: frenetic dance music. It is—probably unintentionally—made for the trainspotters in the crowd, but it’s also made expressly to get asses on the dance floor. Every album (well, not the first one, technically) has a windpunching anthem for/against old age, but they’re most saliently grasped at the beginning of the hermeneutic circle, as a nostalgia to look forward to.

Murphy’s said “I see this band as pure evidence that having a decent idea is more important than being talented,” and neither idea or talent has an age limit. But his relatively advanced age structurally characterizes his approach to music. He’s founded and superseded scene. He’s clearly obsessed with sound. Where the sounds come from, what the sounds sound like, who the sounds were made by—none of those issues is thematic for Murphy. He has an aloofness to reference that is imbued by experience—or absolute innocence. But it’s still contradictory. Like another myriad-minded man, James Joyce, it is clear that he’s obsessed with reference. However, he’s mature enough to deploy sound like a tool. Murphy doesn’t start with reference and end with effect. He doesn’t say to himself, I need an Eno bridge and a Daft Punk chorus, even if that’s what he ends up with almost necessarily. Picking and choosing from a store of sounds, he’s canny enough not to realize his indebtedness to the past while creating dance music for the present. Murphy just picks the very best impetus to get us moving.

In a lot of ways, then, Murphy is less like a grandfather and more like a really good college professor, one who sets the syllabus not to ensure his students have the proper range of, say, literary history and tradition. Rather, his goal is to edify, challenge, and delight. Like any proper art, it is essentially didactic. The LCD project is an object lesson in the pleasures of kinesthetics. It’s dance music for both sorts of people, those who dance and those who don’t. It’s telling that it takes a brainy, referential, super-cool person to make an ideal dance music. It’s hard work.

New York City is often thought to be for young people. You move here when you’re young and hungry. It’s thought of by the flyover states as a playground for the rich, dumb, and ambitious. But it’s not. Have you seen how much an apartment costs? Like a million dollars. No, more. Literally. Think about the heroes of New York City music. Andy Warhol was pushing 40 when he descended on the Velvet Undeground. Thurston Moore was over 30 when Sonic Youth recorded Daydream Nation (in the first third of their career). Now he and Kim Gordon are New York royalty, but they’re basically indistinguishable from any other well-heeled Brooklyn couple pushing a stroller to brunch. Murphy’s just another in the long line of New York’s aged arrivistes. Not a grandfather, barely an associate professor. If his music appeals mostly to young people, it’s because of his talent and knowledge. And the fact that everyone everywhere always feels too old. But New York is an enduring example that if you can make it here, age doesn’t matter.

Woods: At Echo Lake

Woods are playing in my kitchen.  It is May 2010 and I am cooking tacos before I settle into the NBA playoffs for the night.  I am barely listening, browning meat.

Woods are playing on a train ride into work.  The people around me are tired and sullen; preparing for a long day.  A couple holds hands.  I am reading, half-listening.  I notice the easygoing nature of At Echo Lake.

Woods are playing as I stumble toward a train home.  I am drunk (drunj) as all hell and trying to maintain focus.  It’s hard to focus, though, as I try and sing along.  This album rules.  I am yelling the choruses to no one.  “Who knows what tomorrow might bring/ and it shows.”  Sure, the intricacies are lost on me for now, but I am rocking out.

Woods are playing in my bedroom upon my waking.  It is beautiful outside despite me having to go to work soon.  The guitars are standing out now; the tinny vocals affect me.  This album is no fluke.  I like it despite its flaws.  I begin to think the flaws aren’t that at all.  Maybe they are brilliant and I am just predisposed to loving polished work too often.  If these gentlemen were jamming on my porch, I would be enraptured.

Woods are playing as I get off of work. It is still light out for the walk to one of my favorite bars.  I listen to song 4 (”Time Fading Lines”) on repeat a couple of times.  It’s partly because it is a nice slow jam to settle me down and partly because I don’t really like song 5 (the instrumental, “From the Horn”).  I am in love with the way the album sounds now.  I text my friend who recommended it and thank him. The album sounds small and rounded, yet larger than it’s own need.

Woods are playing everywhere I go now.  They are the epitome of penetrating, purposeful sloppiness.  The most impressive thing about At Echo Lake is the fact that Woods could actually be playing anywhere, the bar, the street, the train, the kitchen, the bedroom and it would feel perfectly fine.  They are home after a rough night, they are out during the making of a rough night.  They are sunny and rainy weather, makeshift yet totally in control.  Paradoxes are usually left to technically superior bands, but Woods– they don’t sound technically superior.  This plays directly into why the album works.  They are all the things you need in a rock band without having to play to any strengths.

Woods are playing the last two songs on their album over and over again (”Deep” and “‘Til the Sun Rips”) and I am grateful that they are.  I wish I had a porch.  Hell, these days I wish I had a lot of things.  It has been a rough go.  But I am happy as hell I am alive and listening to At Echo Lake.  They clap my hands for me while I want to bury my head in them.  They sing for me when my voice is ragged from yelling over patrons.  They move my feet when they are in pain from multiple jobs.  They keep my eyes steady when I want to roll them back in my head.  They keep me “ripping it up/ ’til the light hits the eye.”  Woods are playing, so I am listening.  I probably will be for awhile.

Damien Jurado: Saint Bartlett

The measure of a good album comes from an amalgam.  However, the idea that it is a good album comes from personal opinion.  The arbitrary number an album receives from some site, the makeshift paragraphs and accolades, the disappointed sighs in bedrooms or cars as an album fails to grasp a listener, the lonely eyes closing as a line falls through the ears to the pit of the stomach (”Mother/do you know now/ love is not painless, it’s poison?”)– it’s all some reaction to learned sound; a chemical reaction to noise.

Still, the noise will drift over you.  And when the reaction happens, you ignore the reasons why.  You react.  In that way, Saint Bartlett is a reactionary album (”Magic will do/ What magic will do/ living in your eyes.”)  His songs are normal stories set to abnormal thoughts.   A character in a Jurado song is quite often placed in circumstances of the modern condition, yet they are allowed to respond so personally, so devastatingly, that the song stands out in a world of frivolous lyrical impact.  There is no “I love you” or “Come Back to Me” or simple questions.  Instead, it’s “If you return to me.” Characters are given choices and consequences.  They provide insight.

Saint Bartlett’s songs provide insight without overly-catchy lyrics.  Echoing vocals– with the feel of old-school country-western– warble over quiet drums, acoustic and electric guitars, occasional pianos and some accoutrement.  These songs are short and powerful expositions.   The arrangements are delicate at times– “Throwing Your Voice” is an especially thin song with angry, parental lyrics that sound like they are just about to break into sobs.  Other times, the arrangements are beefed-up– “Wallingford” hits harder with a larger guitar sound that makes the vocals seem like an afterthought. A lyric from “Wallingford” backs up the sound: “Calling out/ Your voice is an echo./ No words come back but your own.”

It would be easy to credit the previous paragraph to the production only.  I mean, Richard Swift in a room with Damien Jurado is a room I want to be in.  But, really, production is only as good as the minds collaborating.  I know plenty of songs/albums that have amazing production for no reason.  All the aforementioned instrumentation wields an easygoing construction– like many of Jurado’s older efforts.  What’s impressive is that Saint Bartlett takes unnecessary chances and succeeds without fail.  “Kamala,” my favorite song on the album, could have been very powerful as acoustic sad-sackery.  It even starts off that way in the first chords.  But a full band, including back-up singers, accentuates Jurado’s caterwauling so beautifully that I can’t imagine him playing it alone as I usually prefer him.

And onward the songs go– “Kansas City” is a beautiful remembrance of painful parting, “Harborview” seems like a westernized version of zen koans, “The Falling Snow” is an exercise in futility from a personal perspective, “Beacon Hill” is a simplistic story of sickness (”If you return to me” being an impossibly beautiful line for people unable to function in society), and “With Lightning in Your Hand” is a modified praise-song.  Each and every one of them is near-perfect.  Each one declares themselves like an essay whose thesis sprawls out near a radiator-close, rain-soaked window (”Will you return with a mighty storm?”).

So, yeah, personally I am in love with this album.  From the opener, “Cloudy Shoes” and its repeating lines and hopeful string swells to the downtrodden second wind of the album (songs 9-12), I exercise my right to hear Jurado pining for the pratfalls of life; exploding in sorry fireworks that barely catch the attention of the people he describes (”I wish that/ I could float/ Float up from the ground./ I will never know/ What’s that’s like.) .  Everymen so often ignore the very people singing directly to them (rather than trying to appeal to them), that it is almost impossible to tell them about themselves.  Perhaps that is why Jurado keeps trying (Funny how we all can change/ if we just try to./ I thought it was impossible to live in love like you.).  Maybe it is why we all keep trying.  All you can do is keep trying.  “I’m still trying to fix my mind.” No arbitrary number or preference can refute that.

First Listen: CAW! CAW!’s Bummer Palace

In 1999 I bought my first Pavement album, Wowee Zowee. I think I had heard Crooked Rain, Crooked Rain’s “Cut Your Hair” on MTV’s 120 Minutes or in a friend’s car or something and thought it sounded a bit Weezer-ish and pretty cool. When I got to the record store they didn’t have Crooked Rain, but they did have Wowee Zowee and the cover was sorta funny so I went ahead and purchased that as my first Pavement album. I don’t remember much of my first listen except thinking that this didn’t sound much like “Cut Your Hair.” These songs were really weird, but also kinda cool. I wasn’t really sure what to make of it.

Listening to CAW! CAW!’s Bummer Palace is very similar.  Not that they sound like Pavement (they don’t), but they play music that is not easily categorized and my first impression is that this music is both very strange but also quite awesome and unique. Moreover, this is a band that doesn’t take itself too seriously and has a great sense of humor, both of which are extremely refreshing.

CAW! CAW!’s closest musical relative might be the indie darlings of yesterday, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah or the lesser known but incredibly awesome Kudzu Wish.  Bummer Palace is frantic, angsty rock music that is seemingly always being pulled in a million different directions: pop, indie rock, punk, hardcore, soul, psychedelic, shoegaze. The genre bending is probably Bummer Palace’s greatest strength and biggest weakness.  However, with songs continually shifting and changing, it is a fun album that rewards listeners with multiple listens (I’m on 2.5 listens at time of writing and still trying to wrap my head around some of these songs).

The best introduction to CAW! CAW! might be the “band photo” they’ve posted on their MySpace page:

cawcaw

Interested? Do yourself a favor and go listen to a handful of the tracks from Bummer Palace on their MySpace band page.